翻訳と辞書 ・ R v Rahey
・ R v Reed
・ R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal
・ R v Richards
・ R v Richardson
・ R v Rodgers
・ R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd
・ R v Ruzic
・ R v Ryan
・ R v S (RD)
・ R v Saibene
・ R v Sansregret
・ R v Saskatchewan Wheat Pool
・ R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of)
・ R v Savage
・ R v Schoombie
・ R v Schoonwinkel
・ R v Seaboyer
・ R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Rees-Mogg
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p World Development Movement Ltd
・ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex p O'Brien
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Doody
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Northumbria Police Authority
・ R v Sharpe
・ R v Shein
・ R v Shelembe
|
|
| R v Schoombie ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
R v Schoombie
''R v Schoombie''〔1945 AD 541.〕 is an important case in South African law, heard in the Appellate Division on 21 March 1945, with judgment handed down on 15 May, and Watermeyer CJ, Tindall JA, Greenberg JA and Davis AJA presiding.
== Facts ==
On an indictment for attempted arson, it was proved
* that the accused had gone by car to a shop in the early hours of the morning, taking with him petrol and a tin containing inflammable material;
* that he had placed the tin against the door of the shop and poured petrol into and around it in such a way that the petrol ran under the door into the shop; and
* that he was at this stage interrupted by the arrival of a "native" constable.
The accused was duly convicted.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「R v Schoombie」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|